| |
Interfacing
to processes
In
terms purely of interfacing to processes, the suitability of either RIBC's
or FIBC's is dependent to a large extent upon the quantities of material
that are required for a given production run. It is unlikely that a plant
will have the luxury of dedicated feed stations for every single ingredient
that will be required from the IBC's, therefore the ease of installing
fresh IBC's onto the feed station will be a consideration. The physical
lifting and placement of both types of IBC are similar and represent no
special problems. However, the interfacing to the process can present
quite different considerations for both genres of IBC.
FIBC's
For
applications where a only few hundred kilograms are required there can be
problems with using a
|
|
800kg FIBC, for example. In general the dust-free sealing
of the FIBC to the feed out station can be readily achieved with proprietary
equipment. However closing off the spout after a partial discharge can
cause considerable problems for operatives (due to the need to tie off
the spout through a constrained column of material having a diameter defined
by the spout). A commonly encountered approach to this problem is to only
slacken off the drawstrings and thus discharge the required amount of
material through a partially constricted spout. Although this makes closure
of the FIBC easier for the operators, it also induces erratic and unreliable
discharge (despite the use of vibrators which are commonly installed on
discharge stations). Tensioning of the inner liners in food or pharmaceutical
applications is also an important factor in avoiding constrictions of
the outlet.
|
|